Skip Repetitive Navigation


NatureServe Unique Identifier: CEGL003836: Arundinaria gigantea ssp. gigantea Shrubland

Park Vegetation Plot Summary

Tree Canopy: N/A

Tree subcanopy: N/A

Tall Shrubs and Saplings: Arundinaria gigantea

Herbs (field): N/A

Nonvascular: N/A

Habitat Image

GLOBAL COMMUNITY CONCEPT

  • This association is characterized by dense, often monospecific thickets of the bamboo shrub Arundinaria gigantea occupying large areas referred to as canebrakes.
    • The canebrake shrubland type was historically widespread, but is now rare and occupies very little of its former acreage.
    • It was best developed in streamside flats and alluvial floodplains on ridges and terraces where it was protected from prolonged inundation.
    • Historically, this community covered large areas of many floodplains and streamsides in the Coastal Plain from North Carolina to Texas, Mississippi River Alluvial Plain, Interior Highlands, Interior Low Plateau, Southern Blue Ridge and possibly the Central Appalachians of the southeastern United States.
    • Stands occur on alluvial and loess soils and are often associated with bottomland hardwood forest vegetation.
    • This association is successional and is thought to be maintained by periodic fires.

  • It may have originated following abandonment of aboriginal agricultural fields or other natural and anthropogenic disturbances such as blow-downs and catastrophic floods.
    • Historical accounts report cane as abundant along the Wabash and Ohio drainage systems, as well as common along larger rivers (Buffalo, White, Norfork) in the Ozarks and Ouachitas.
    • It was also reported as common along the Red and Mississippi rivers in Louisiana, Coastal Prairie rivers in Texas, and the Black, Washita, Arkansas, Sabine, Pearl, Tombigbee, Yazoo, Savannah, and St. Mary's rivers.
    • Large, extant canebrakes still exist and have been documented from the Ocmulgee Basin, south of Macon, Georgia.

  • In the Central Appalachians various wetlands, including those on alluvial or loess substrates (streamside flats, bottomlands), were dominated by Arundinaria, without an overstory, or with widely scattered trees.

PARK VEGETATION PLOT SUMMARY

DISTRIBUTION

North America:
  • This association was widespread historically but now occupies very little acreage.
    • It may be found along rivers and streamsides in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and possibly Virginia (?).
Click here for NA range map
 
In the Park:
  • This community was sampled from one location on the Cades Cove quadrangle.
    • It is unlikely on the Mount Le Conte quadrangle.
    • It could occur in other areas of the park, particularly along larger rivers.

  • This community was sampled from the western end of the Cades Cove Loop Road, along Abrams Creek.
Click here for GRSMNP Range Map

CONSERVATION STATUS

Global Status:

  • Global Conservation Status Rank: G2? (Last reviewed: 02 15 1999).

  • Stands of this vegetation type were historically widespread, but now are rare or occupy very little acreage.
    • It is thought to be maintained by frequent fire and may have historically resulted from aboriginal agriculture and burning.
    • Dense, monospecific stands of Arundinaria gigantea ssp. gigantea were historically found in bottomland sites throughout the southeastern United States.
    • Today, this vegetation exists as small remnants, and high-quality examples are extremely rare.

Park Status:

Picking, digging, or otherwise damaging plants is prohibited in the Park. Collection is allowed only by special permit for research or educational purposes.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Field Work:

NatureServe

Supporting Institutions:

N/A

Forest Association Described By:

K.D. Patterson

Web Page:

Charles Wilder.

Photographs:

NatureServe

Maps:

N/A

REFERENCES

Barden, L. S. 1997. Historic prairies in the Piedmont of North and South Carolina, USA. Natural Areas Journal 17 (2):149-152.

Blair, W. F. 1938. Ecological relationships of the mammals of the Bird Creek region, northeastern Oklahoma. The American Midland Naturalist 20:473-526.

CAP [Central Appalachian Forest Working Group]. 1998. Central Appalachian Working group discussions. The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA.

Campbell, J. J. N. 1980. Present and presettlement forest conditions in the Inner Bluegrass region of Kentucky. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kentucky, Lexington. 109 pp. [Excerpts only]

Campbell, J. J. N. 1989b. Historical evidence of forest composition in the Bluegrass Region of Kentucky. Pages 231-246 in: Proceedings of the Seventh Central Hardwood Forest Conference, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.

Davidson, U. M. 1950. The original vegetation of Lexington, Kentucky and vicinity. M.S. thesis, University of Kentucky, Lexington. 45 pp.

Flores, D. L. 1984. Jefferson and southwestern exploration. The Freeman and Curtis accounts of the Red River Expedition of 1806. University of Oklahoma Press.

Foti, T., M. Blaney, X. Li, and K. G. Smith. 1994. A classification system for the natural vegetation of Arkansas. Proceedings of the Arkansas Academy of Science 48:50-53.

Heineke, T. E. 1987. The flora and plant communities of the middle Mississippi River Valley. Ph.D. dissertation, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale. 653 pp.

Hoagland, B. W. 1997. Preliminary plant community classification for Oklahoma. Unpublished draft document, version 35629. University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory, Norman. 47 pp.

Hoagland, B. W. 1998c. Oklahoma riparian vegetation. In: A. Fallon and M. Smolen, editors. Riparian area management handbook. Publication number E-952. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater.

Hoagland, B. 2000. The vegetation of Oklahoma: A classification for landscape mapping and conservation planning. The Southwestern Naturalist 45(4):385-420.

Hughes 1966, McClain pers. comm., McInteer 1952, Meanley 1972, Mohr 1901, Nigh pers. comm., Nuttall 1821,

Peet, R. K., T. R. Wentworth, M. P. Schafale, and A.S. Weakley. 2002. Unpublished data of the North Carolina Vegetation Survey. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Platt, S. G., and C. G. Brantley. 1992. The management and restoration of switchcane (Louisiana). Restoration Management Notes 10:84-85.

Platt, S. G., and C. G. Brantley. 1997. Canebrakes: An ecological and historical perspective. Castanea 62:8-21.

Schafale, M. 1998b. Fourth approximation guide. High mountain communities. March 1998 draft. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh.

Smeins, F. E., D. D. Diamond, and C. W. Hanselka. 1992. Coastal Prairie. Pages 269-290 in: R. T. Coupland, editor. Natural Grasslands. Elsevier, New York.

Southeastern Ecology Working Group of NatureServe. No date. International Ecological Classification Standard: International Vegetation Classification. Terrestrial Vegetation. NatureServe, Durham, NC.

West, E. M. 1934. Canebrakes of the southeastern United States. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.


Visit the NatureServe web site Visit the Nature Conservancy web site Visit the University of Georgia web site